<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">No week in crypto goes without eye-catching headlines. This past week saw major regulatory developments in the digital assets sector. U.S. Congress members proposed a bill banning algo stables, a DAO and all of its voting members were targeted by the CFTC and market-making firm Wintermute suffered a $160 million exploit. </span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Here are the details on these three stories: </span></p> <h2><b>Wintermute hacked for $160 million</b></h2> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">On Tuesday, market-making firm Wintermute suffered a</span> <a href="https://www.theblock.co/post/171135/crypto-market-maker-wintermute-hacked-for-160-million"><span style="font-weight: 400;">$160 million hack</span></a> <span style="font-weight: 400;">on its Ethereum vault address, making it one of the largest recent crypto hacks. The incident occurred because of the firm's use of a crypto</span> <a href="https://www.theblock.co/post/171192/experts-blame-a-vanity-address-bug-for-wintermutes-160-million-hack"><span style="font-weight: 400;">"vanity address"</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> that was found to be inherently vulnerable to theft. The address was generated with a tool called Profanity. Prior to the hack, a security disclosure report from 1inch</span><a href="https://www.theblock.co/post/170359/1inch-claims-potential-exploit-on-profanity-generated-ethereum-addresses"> <span style="font-weight: 400;">discovered</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> that hackers could calculate private keys of all Profanity-based addresses using GPU chips.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Wintermute’s vanity address was used as an admin account to its vault. Extracting the private key, a hacker was able to take over the specific address and use its admin privilege to then drain Wintermute’s vault. Wintermute has</span><a href="https://www.theblock.co/post/171993/market-maker-wintermute-tells-hacker-to-return-funds-or-face-legal-action"> <span style="font-weight: 400;">requested</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> that the hacker return the stolen funds and offered a $16 million bounty. So far it has not heard back from the perpetrator.</span></p> <h2><b>Draft legislation seeks to temporarily ban algo stablecoins </b></h2> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Some U.S. Congress members proposed a </span><a href="https://www.theblock.co/post/171565/draft-stablecoin-bill-in-congress-to-require-fed-state-regulator-approval"><span style="font-weight: 400;">draft bill</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> to create a federal framework for stablecoins. One of the proposals is a ban on algorithmic stablecoins backed by "endogenous collateral," or internal collateral that stablecoin issuers create by themselves. Such cryptocurrency-backed stablecoins include assets that work similarly to the now-collapsed </span><a href="https://www.theblock.co/post/146444/terra-luna-and-ust-how-we-got-here"><span style="font-weight: 400;">TerraUSD</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> (UST), whose value was supported using an algorithm as well as the project's own asset, called LUNA.</span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">If passed, the bill would ban algorithmic stablecoins for two years and provide that dollar-denominated stablecoins be backed with cash or highly liquid assets like U.S. Treasury bonds. The draft bill also proposes that issuers of stablecoins who launch without approval from appropriate regulators may be penalized with five years in prison and a $1 million fine.</span></p> <h2><b>CFTC charges Ooki DAO and its members</b></h2> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">On Sept. 22, the crypto sector witnessed yet another regulatory development concerning decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs). U.S. regulator Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) </span><a href="https://www.theblock.co/post/172274/cftc-files-lawsuit-against-decentralized-autonomous-organization"><span style="font-weight: 400;">filed</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> a legal complaint against a DAO called Ooki, alleging that the project has been illegally running a futures exchange. </span></p> <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, and alleged that the DAO was an unincorporated association involved in unlawful activity. The complaint further claimed that the Ooki DAO members who voted on the project's governance decisions with its native token are individually liable for the actions of the DAO. This has sparked a debate among legal experts, according to a </span><a href="https://www.theblock.co/post/172416/whats-next-for-daos-breaking-down-the-cftcs-latest-enforcement-action"><span style="font-weight: 400;">report</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> from The Block.</span></p><br /><span class="copyright"><p>© 2023 The Block Crypto, Inc. All Rights Reserved. This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.</p> </span>