Data & Insights: Billions in DeFi TVL Leaves; Pokémania

Quick Take
- Data & Insights is a weekly series showcasing top charts from The Block’s Data Dashboard.
- This week, we’re taking a look at STRC and onchain Pokémon volumes. We’ll also look at Circle, the broader impacts of the exploit, and Polymarket election data.
We'd love your feedback.
DeFi-nitely Troubling
- DeFi's total value locked has remained under sustained pressure this week, and the Kelp DAO bridge exploit has further eroded trust in DeFi platforms. On April 18, an attacker drained 116,500 rsETH from Kelp DAO's LayerZero-powered bridge, worth roughly $292 million and representing approximately 18% of the token's circulating supply.
- The attacker manipulated LayerZero's cross-chain messaging layer into processing a fraudulent transfer instruction, moving funds to a wallet pre-funded through Tornado Cash hours earlier.
- The downstream effects moved quickly. The attacker deposited stolen rsETH onto Aave V3 as collateral and borrowed wrapped ether against it, generating over $196 million in bad debt concentrated in the dominant rsETH-WETH pair. Aave's TVL dropped roughly $6.6 billion as a result, with its token falling 16%.
- This exploit was felt throughout DeFi. Across categories, the day after the exploit, lending TVL is down 13.09%, liquid staking 3.38%, DEXs 2.65%, and derivatives 3.01%. The Kelp exploit is the largest single contributor, but it did not arrive in isolation.
- Total DeFi TVL recorded a single-day drawdown of 5.61%, placing it at roughly the 97.9th percentile of severity since 2024, though three separate days in 2025 and early 2026 saw drawdowns exceeding 10%.
- Total DeFi exploits in the past three weeks now exceed $1 billion, following the $285 million Drift Protocol attack on April 1, attributed to North Korean actors.
- The frequency and scale of recent attacks are prompting harder questions about cross-chain infrastructure. Bridges remain among the highest-risk components in DeFi, and successive failures across different protocols suggest the problem is structural rather than isolated.
- With seemingly more risks uncovered in DeFi, some users are questioning whether the yield opportunities available onchain justify the security risks.
Giving a big STRC
- Strategy's preferred stock complex saw its most active trading week on record, driven by STRC approaching its ex-dividend date. STRC recorded $15.8 million in single-day volume on April 14th, part of a weekly total of approximately $38.5 million across the five trading days.
- The volume spike follows a pattern that is well understood in equity markets. In the days surrounding an ex-dividend date, traders who want to capture the upcoming dividend payment accumulate shares, then sell after the record date is set. The stock price typically drops by approximately the dividend amount on the ex-date itself, creating short-term volatility that attracts both dividend capture strategies and tactical traders.
- STRC has been the most actively marketed of Strategy's preferred share issuances, which also include STRK, STRD, and STRF. Its 11.5% annual yield has been the primary draw for income-oriented investors seeking Bitcoin-correlated exposure through a structured equity instrument.
- Strategy has proposed doubling STRC's dividend payment frequency from monthly to twice monthly.
- The annual yield would remain unchanged at 11.5%, but each individual payment would be half the current size. Smaller per-payment amounts translate directly into smaller ex-dividend price drawdowns, which reduces the stock's realized volatility profile.
- That reduction in volatility is structurally meaningful. Risk parity funds, which size positions based on volatility contribution, have historically been unable to hold high-yielding preferred stocks with large periodic drawdowns. A smoother dividend schedule could make STRC eligible for a broader class of systematic buyers, potentially expanding the passive demand base beyond its current income-focused investor set.
Pokémania
- Weekly revenue across Pokémon TCG marketplaces rose to $5.38 million for the week ending April 6, just shy of the all-time high set in September 2025
- What's significant this time compared to six months ago is the structural difference.
- The September 2025 high was concentrated in a single Collector Crypt pump week due to its TGE, while the current high prints have stacked across six consecutive weeks, with Courtyard responsible for the majority.
- The second-order read is that tokenized collectibles have moved past the "NFT adjacent" category and into a workable RWA subcategory.
- Courtyard's model, which uses physical cards vaulted with a third-party custodian and backed by an NFT redeemable for the physical card, is attracting collectors seeking fractional liquidity without crypto-native speculation risk.
- The tokenization layer of these platforms is being used as a liquidity wrapper, as opposed to a purely speculative venue.
- This means cards are flowing out for physical delivery, which validates the pricing function of the onchain market.
- Furthermore, this creates a template for the broader "tokenized IP and collectibles" thesis that NFT-era projects failed to productize.
- Courtyard's revenue run-rate, which is ~$200 million annualized at current levels, exceeds that of most mid-tier NFT marketplaces in 2021, but with orders of magnitude less marketing spend because demand is being pulled by riding the hype of the physical Pokémon market.
- The near-term risk is that the physical Pokémon bull market comes to a halt.
- On the other hand, the long-term opportunity is that this proves a product-market fit for tokenized collectibles, setting the architectural standard that could be followed by sports cards and watches.
CRCL-ar Motion
- Circle's market capitalization reached $25.7 billion per Friday’s close, making it the best-performing crypto-related equity YTD at roughly +30%, while Coinbase trails the group at -10%.
- It is worth noting that Circle's revenue is effectively a levered play on USDC supply and short-term Treasury yields.
- The circulating supply of USDC is up 3.7% YTD and over 30% in the last 12 months, while rates have been declining, meaning Circle's revenue from an absolute reserve base expansion outpaced the revenue lost due to yield compression.
- On the other hand, the October 2025 crypto liquidation cascade destroyed speculative trading volume, negatively impacting Coinbase's trading fee revenue, which its Base L2 and staking revenue likely could not offset.
- The second-order observation is the dispersion itself among crypto-related equities.
- Every crypto-related stock in the market now has their own differentiated business models that respond to different drivers.
- For example, Circle to stablecoin supply and rates, MicroStrategy to BTC spot and Coinbase to trading volumes and token prices of its venture portfolio.
- This dispersion likely rewrites how institutional crypto allocations are constructed.
- Years ago, traditional institutional investors that wanted crypto exposure other than spot BTC or ETH likely previously bought COIN as a proxy.
- Going forward, the stablecoin adoption thesis can now be expressed through CRCL, the BTC treasury thesis through MSTR and pure crypto beta through COIN
- The key question is whether the U.S. stablecoin regulatory framework drives meaningful competition among bank-issued dollar tokens in 2026.
- As Circle's moat lies in distribution and brand, a JPMorgan- or BofA-issued tokenized dollar with equivalent regulatory standing would quickly compress CRCL multiples.
Electing the World
- Polymarket has been a growing venue for people to predict election outcomes. The platform has processed over $1.7 billion in election volume across more than 70 elections globally.
- For most of the period between January and March 2026, US election volume consistently accounted for 60-80% of market share, reflecting the outsized attention US participants have.
- As the US enters a period without a major domestic election cycle, non-US volume has surged to near-parity, with the US share recently falling to its lowest point. Election activity around contests in Hungary and Peru contributed to several of the spikes visible in April.
- The trend raises a broader point about what prediction markets are becoming. Unlike traditional polling, which measures sentiment, markets aggregate probabilistic forecasts from participants with financial skin in the game.
- Research comparing Polymarket to polling aggregates during the 2024 US presidential election found that market prices incorporated new information faster than polling averages, typically adjusting within hours of major events while polls took days.
- As more election cycles outside the US generate meaningful volume, Polymarket's accuracy and efficiency as a real-time global political intelligence layer will likely increase alongside it
Disclaimer: The Block is an independent media outlet that delivers news, research, and data. As of November 2023, Foresight Ventures is a majority investor of The Block. Foresight Ventures invests in other companies in the crypto space. Crypto exchange Bitget is an anchor LP for Foresight Ventures. The Block continues to operate independently to deliver objective, impactful, and timely information about the crypto industry. Here are our current financial disclosures.
© 2026 The Block. All Rights Reserved. This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.

