Following Celsius freeze, US policymakers are on high alert for crypto systemic contagion

Quick Take

  • Policymakers in Washington are watching the situation around crypto lender Celsius, which froze withdrawals this past weekend.
  • SEC chair Gary Gensler briefly remarked on the Celsius developments during a media appearance Tuesday.

All eyes are watching crypto lender Celsius’s freeze on withdrawals. Among them are lawmakers and regulators already suspicious of crypto.

Announced Sunday night, the freeze appeared to lock up as much as $11 billion in assets that connect to many vectors of the broader crypto market.

Observers are watching for the fallout in the broader market. Just a month after the high-profile collapse of Terra, policymakers in Washington, DC were already on the lookout for more case studies of crypto firm failures.

Celsius advertised itself as a crypto-native bank, offering users high-interest savings accounts and low-interest — though over-collateralized — loans relative to traditional banks. It never had FDIC insurance on those accounts, and seems to have engaged in more high-risk speculative investments than a bank would allow, alongside its heavily collateralized loans to users.

The Securities and Exchange Commission and state securities regulators spent much of last summer making clear that they viewed these lending products as unregistered securities as unregistered securities — rather than bank accounts, which are exempt from such a classification. The SEC famously shut down Coinbase’s Lend platform before it launched.

“The SEC did a really good job of getting in front of Coinbase and getting in front of BlockFi, but they’ve done a reprehensible job of getting in front of Celsius,” says John Reed Stark, who led the SEC’s office of internet enforcement until 2009.

Stark currently teaches at Duke Law School and maintains a significant online presence with criticism of the crypto industry. He expressed shock that the SEC hadn’t issued a temporary restraining order against the firm.

SEC Chair Gensler referenced Celsius in all but name before a Wall Street Journal audience Tuesday as an example of risks when crypto custodians don’t segregate customer assets.

“Many of the crypto lending platforms, they actually own your asset in some joint omnibus account,” said Gensler. “Then you see things like this weekend and Monday where there's one crypto exchange, one crypto lending platform said ‘You can't withdraw. Not now.’"

Gensler drew a comparison with the meme stock scandal of January 2021, where Robinhood locked up customer funds. He praised the relative protections, making them the basis for a plea: “Here in crypto exchanges and lending, we should be able to bring those same protections and make sure that those protections are there, but they're not there right now.“

In an interview with The Block back in September, Celsius CEO Alex Mashinsky said “we've done things in a compliant way from day one.” Of the SEC, he said:

“What they're worried about is a non-accredited investor. The whole fight, the whole question mark, is whether an unaccredited investor, which normally could go to a bank or SBIC account and earn a little bit of yield over there, you know, should they participate in these programs or not? And when banks used to pay four or 5%, that was a reasonable option. Today, banks pay 0.1%.”

The impact on retail investors is a central concern. And as was the case with Terra, industry players in DC are currently watching out for spillover to other branches of the market. Damage to retail investors is a major concern for responses to Celsius itself.

The notion of an individual crypto firm failing is not necessarily calamitous to many in Congress. If crypto firms start going down like dominoes, however, and crashing the broader market, then the industry might be viewed through the lens of “systemic risk.”

Such a label might incur oversight from the Financial Stability Oversight Council, which has sweeping if seldom-used authorities.

Celsius’ relationship to Tether, the largest stablecoin operator, is of particular interest in this respect. With a supply that’s already been slipping as customers have redeemed USDT, Tether was known to have exposure to Celsius, though Tether denies an impact. Its overall reserves were also subject to widespread suspicion and scrutiny, though USDT remains by far the most voluminously traded stablecoin in the world.

“Tether right now has exposure to Celsius has been bleeding out customers for quite a while now. So if that part of its equity base just evaporates, it might face a liquidity crisis,” said Rohan Grey, an assistant professor at Willamette Law School and a well-known crypto critic.

Celsius’ predicament right now is “a classic shadow bank run,” Grey said. “This is literally the definition of a banking collapse. It’s not just an unregistered security.”

As for what happens next, these events will surely become talking points in Congress, but the lawmaking process is decidedly jammed up. Staffers cite the August before midterms as a common — if unofficial — deadline for legislation.

The SEC may be moving slowly, but it is clearly aware of what’s happening with Celsius. And the firm has already been the subject of scrutiny from the New York Attorney General.

“I feel like cases against Celsius and Terra are imminent. Both civil and maybe criminal,” said Stark. According to him, if there’s a criminal investigation from the US attorney, the SEC typically stops its investigations.


© 2022 The Block Crypto, Inc. All Rights Reserved. This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.

About Author

Kollen Post is a senior reporter at The Block, covering all things policy and geopolitics from Washington, DC. That includes legislation and regulation, securities law and money laundering, cyber warfare, corruption, CBDCs, and blockchain’s role in the developing world. He speaks Russian and Arabic. You can send him leads at [email protected]