Fantom is exploring adding optimistic rollups to connect to Ethereum

Quick Take
- The Fantom Foundation is investigating adding optimistic rollups between Fantom and Ethereum.
- This would turn it into a Layer 2 on Ethereum â but cofounder and architect Andre Cronje doesn’t see it that way.
Last month, Celo network proposed and approved a plan to turn its Layer 1 blockchain into a Layer 2 on Ethereum using optimistic rollups â a move that initially pumped its native token 18% when it was first announced.
In an interview on The Scoop, Fantom Foundation co-founder and architect Andre Cronje said that Fantom is actively considering and investigating a similar move to integrate optimistic rollups to connect the Fantom blockchain to Ethereum.
âWe have been looking at Optimistic Stacks, Arbitrum Stack, all of these things to see how their canonical bridges use these proofs to be able to have [a] higher security guarantee,â Cronje said. âAre we considering one of their stacks to become our own canonical bridge? Yes, we are. And we are actively investigating that.â
Cronje confirmed that if Fantom adopts optimistic rollups and provides a full transaction history on Ethereum, then Fantom would need to pay transaction fees to write these snapshots to Ethereum.
Fantom Foundation CEO Michael Kong added that implementing Layer 2 technology in this way will allow the Fantom network to access more liquidity from the Ethereum ecosystem.
Layer 2? More like a bridge
Cronje, however, doesnât think thereâs any such thing as a Layer 2 network. He prefers to see whatâs typically referred to as a Layer 2 network as a sidechain and sees the optimistic rollup technology that combines them as a bridge between the two. He acknowledged itâs a semantic difference, but one he said heâs quite passionate about.
âShould we adopt â or rather, when we adopt â that bridge, does that make us a Layer 2? No, because a Layer 2 is just a sidechain," he said.
Cronje argued that such Layer 2 technology, like optimistic rollups, is a bridging technology that allows for native assets to move to another blockchain in a slightly more secure way. But he argued that the security this technology provides is invalidated once there are other bridges connected to the blockchains in question.
âIt does make the canonical assets safer, which is awesome and that's why we're investigating it. But at the same time, if something goes wrong and people try and get their assets out, they're not really going to be able to because it's likely that those assets were already bridged out by other mechanisms. The only times it would really work is if there is a complete chain halt,â he said.
The Staking Race: Ethereum's Queue, Solana's Yield, and Where Institutional Money Is Going
More videos â
