Sam Bankman-Fried plans to keep new lawyers despite potential conflict of interest: reports

Quick Take

  • Sam Bankman-Fried’s decision to part ways with his trial lawyers and to work with new lawyers on his appeal is par for the course, experts say. 
  • Earlier this month, U.S. prosecutors wrote a letter to U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan asking for a hearing about the potential conflicts of interest that could arise since Mukasey and Young represent both Bankman-Fried and former Celsius CEO Mashinsky.

Former FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried plans to continue with his new legal team, which is also representing another former crypto executive, Alex Mashinsky, according to multiple news reports. 

During his first appearance in a Manhattan federal court since his November conviction on multiple fraud charges, Bankman-Fried stated his intention to be represented by lawyers Marc Mukasey and Torrey Young. Bankman-Fried's current attorneys, Cohen & Gresser's Mark Cohen and Christian Everdell, plan to withdraw from the case, according to reports.

Wearing a tan jail shirt and chains around his ankles, Bankman-Fried told the court on Wednesday that "at a high level," he recognized that his counsel also represents Mashinsky, according to Reuters

Earlier this month, U.S. prosecutors wrote a letter to U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan asking for a hearing about the potential conflicts of interest that could arise since Mukasey and Young represent both Bankman-Fried and former Celsius CEO Mashinsky. Mukasey and Young were brought in to represent SBF as counsel in January, according to court filings. 

Celsius loaned money to Alameda Research, the hedge fund linked to FTX, and these loans were repaid by the fund to Celsius using FTX customer funds, according to evidence presented at Bankman-Fried's trial. Bankman-Fried could argue that Celsius was not defrauded and not entitled to restitution in a future appeal, while Mashinsky could argue the opposite, the prosecutors explained. Both FTX and Celsius have since filed for bankruptcy. 

"The relationship between Alameda Research and Celsius creates the potential for conflicts in several respects," the U.S. prosecutors said in their letter. 

Bankman-Fried said he had discussed the potential conflict with appellate counsel Alexandra Shapiro who will be a part of his eventual appeal, according to Reuters

Par for the course

Ira Lee Sorkin, who represented the infamous Ponzi scheme mastermind Bernie Madoff, said new lawyers often come in after a trial who have appellate experience. 

THE SCOOP

Keep up with the latest news, trends, charts and views on crypto and DeFi with a new biweekly newsletter from The Block's Frank Chaparro

By signing-up you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
By signing-up you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

"To the extent that the court and the lawyers want to make sure that any communications that Mr. Bankman-Fried had with the Cohen firm, he's going to waive the attorney-client privilege so that the Cohen firm can communicate with the Mukasey firm with respect to the appeal. That's all there is, it's not uncommon at all," Sorkin said in an interview with The Block. 

Bankman-Fried appears to plan to work with Mukasey and Young on his appeal, said Braden Perry, partner at Kennyhertz Perry and a former federal enforcement attorney, said in an email to The Block. 

"Attorneys, especially specialized white collar and appellate attorneys, run into many potential conflicts and ethical issues in representing clients within the same industry, and in this case, set of facts," Perry said. 

Perry noted that since Bankman-Fried's new legal representatives also serve Mashinsky, this dual representation could introduce complications concerning restitution and Alameda Research's status as a creditor to Celsius.

Bankman-Fried is behind bars after being found guilty by a New York jury last year on all counts for defrauding investors. Mashinsky meanwhile is awaiting a trial set to begin in January 2025 after he was charged last year with fraud and misleading customers about core aspects of the business. 

Mashinsky was in court on Tuesday where he also waived his right to object to having a lawyer without conflicts of interest, according to Inner City Press


Disclaimer: The Block is an independent media outlet that delivers news, research, and data. As of November 2023, Foresight Ventures is a majority investor of The Block. Foresight Ventures invests in other companies in the crypto space. Crypto exchange Bitget is an anchor LP for Foresight Ventures. The Block continues to operate independently to deliver objective, impactful, and timely information about the crypto industry. Here are our current financial disclosures.

© 2023 The Block. All Rights Reserved. This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.

About Author

Sarah is a reporter at The Block covering policy, regulation and legal happenings. Before, Sarah was a reporter with CQ Legal writing about securities regulation, which is where she first started reporting on crypto. Sarah has also written for The Bond Buyer and American Banker, among other finance-related publications. She graduated from the University of Missouri and earned a degree in print and digital journalism. Sarah is based in Washington D.C., and is an avid coffee lover. You can follow her on Twitter @ForTheWynn.

Editor

To contact the editor of this story:
Lawrence Lewitinn at
[email protected]