Ferrie v. Woodford Research LLC, et al., 3:19-cv-05798 (W.D. Wash. filed August 28, 2019)[NMR]
This newly filed lawsuit from Washington state has about 12,000 defendants, which is a lot. The complaint also has this quote allegedly from Richard Branson, “People have made fortunes off Bitcoin. Some have lost money. It is volatile, but people make money off of volatility too.” The reason that quote is in this lawsuit is because the plaintiff allegedly engaged the defendants to take advantage of an arbitrage scheme that they say went south.
The plaintiff here is Douglas Ferrie a resident of Washington who for several years says he followed something called “Hubert Senters Daily Video Update.” The daily video programming covered price trends of stocks and commodities.
Allegedly, on Nov. 30, 2018, two of the defendants that allegedly control an outfit called Woodford Research, published a presentation online regarding “The 1% Club” that “described a new investment opportunity involving arbitraging cryptocurrencies.” (Mkay, sounds pretty par for the course in this space). The idea was that a trading bot would capture arbitrage opportunities across crypto exchanges around the world. Allegedly, in that presentation the defendants made the following statements:
“Defendant ARBITRAGING consistently received an average rate of return of 0.73 percent within the seven-month period preceding December 2018. In other words, an investor’s money doubled every three months”
“An initial investment of $100,000 would have a value of over $1.4 million dollars in one year if no funds are withdrawn”
“The only risk is the setup procedure; if it is followed cautiously and precisely according to the procedure he provides, then risk is eliminated”
Something, something, about things seeming to be too good to be true. The pièce de résistance though of this marketing puffery was the following line “[t]his opportunity only arises once in a generation.” Naturally, seeking to capitalize on the opportunity of a lifetime the plaintiff contacted the defendants allegedly in charge of Woodford Research on Dec. 1, 2018. The sign up process to take part in the investment was as follows:
“Account setup required an investor to first purchase Ether (ETH), then use ETH to purchase ARBs on Defendant ARBITRAGING’s website, at which point, the daily account value, rate of return, and earnings would be denominated in US dollars on an investors’ account on Defendant ARBITRAGING’s website.”
To recap, the plaintiff, allegedly on the advice of the people running Woodford Research, invested money into another company that promised arbitrage opportunities if you bought their token, ARBs, which would somehow power their advanced arbitrage bot, I guess? You can guess where this is heading.
The plaintiff, allegedly with the help of the defendants, went through the account setup process, and then problems started popping up almost immediately. Despite difficulties with the process, the plaintiff made three separate investments into the arbitrage company. Over the course of many months there was back-and-forth communication between the plaintiff and the defendants about difficulties using their website and why the plaintiff was being charged so much in fees, and why wasn’t his investment taking off, etc. “In total, Plaintiff invested $166,000 of his retirement, health savings account (HSA), and personal funds at Defendant ARBITRAGING.” Ouch.
In essence, the plaintiff is alleging here that all the people that run the defendant companies, the investment research firm and the arbitrage bot company, are all in cahoots and no such bot exists. The alleged counts include securities fraud, breach of contract, fraudulent misrepresentation, negligent misrepresentation, fraudulent concealment, unjust enrichment, alter ego liability (a CCM first?), and civil conspiracy.
A wise man once said to me “the real hero of the crypto space is Charles Ponzi.” Perhaps, that take is too cynical and irreverent, but we’ve seen so many lawsuits that look and feel like this lawsuit. The defendants will likely deny the allegations, and perhaps be able to shed some light on why the plaintiff had these alleged difficulties and where his money may have gone, but we’ll have to wait and see.
Disclaimer: These summaries are provided for educational purposes only by Nelson Rosario and Stephen Palley. This is not legal advice. These are our opinions only, aren’t authorized by any past, present or future client or employer. Also we might change our minds. We contain multitudes.
© 2022 The Block Crypto, Inc. All Rights Reserved. This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.