SEC should consider proposing rules to regulate crypto, Republican commissioner says

Quick Take

  • The Republican commissioner said the SEC could have taken steps to help create laws for cryptocurrencies, but didn’t. 

Securities and Exchange Commission's Mark Uyeda said the agency needs to consider proposing rules or guidance to regulate cryptocurrencies instead of taking a more enforcement-like approach.

The Republican commissioner said the SEC could have taken steps to aid in creating laws for cryptocurrencies, but didn't. 

"Unfortunately, the SEC did not take this approach and instead is pursuing a case-by-case approach through enforcement actions. As a result, it will take years to reach any type of legally-binding precedent, as matters will need to wind their way through the courts before reaching the court of appeals level," Uyeda said on Monday in prepared remarks in London.  

Uyeda's comments come as the SEC has been vigorous in charges against crypto firms including exchanges Binance and Coinbase. Cases have made their way through the courts this past year, where judges have had to take a role in figuring out how laws apply to the sector.

The crypto industry has argued that they have a difficult time being compliant and still competitive without a clear regulatory path forward in the U.S.

Here comes Howey 


Keep up with the latest news, trends, charts and views on crypto and DeFi with a new biweekly newsletter from The Block's Frank Chaparro

By signing-up you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
By signing-up you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

SEC Chair Gary Gensler has stayed true to his views that most cryptocurrencies are securities, except for bitcoin, and that crypto firms need to register with the agency. In its charges against crypto firms, the SEC often cites the Howey Test, a 1946 U.S. Supreme Court case involving citrus groves to determine whether transactions are investment contracts and thus subject to securities laws.

Deciding what a security is can be complicated, Uyeda said on Monday.

"What is, and what is not, a security can be a difficult analysis – not just for market participants, but also for the courts who must analyze the investment contract test described by the U.S. Supreme Court in a 1946 decision," Uyeda said. 

Uyeda also criticized the SEC's approach to other parts of the capital markets, including communications around brokerage firms. 

"Determining whether a person's conduct violates the federal securities laws should not be akin to the Hogwart's sorting hat from Harry Potter, where one's fate is predicted, sometimes wrongly, based on which rule or law the SEC plans to enforce in a way that it has not been interpreted before," Uyeda said. 

© 2023 The Block. All Rights Reserved. This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.


About Author

Sarah is a reporter at The Block covering policy, regulation and legal happenings. Before, Sarah was a reporter with CQ Legal writing about securities regulation, which is where she first started reporting on crypto. Sarah has also written for The Bond Buyer and American Banker, among other finance-related publications. She graduated from the University of Missouri and earned a degree in print and digital journalism. Sarah is based in Washington D.C., and is an avid coffee lover. You can follow her on Twitter @ForTheWynn.


To contact the editor of this story:
Nathan Crooks at
[email protected]