Court sides with SEC in case against crypto influencer Ian Balina

Quick Take

  • The judge said that securities laws applied to Balina and that SPRK tokens met the criteria of the Howey Test. 
  • Balina was charged in September 2022 over his involvement with an unregistered initial coin offering, or ICO.

Crypto investor and YouTuber Ian Balina broke U.S. securities laws when he offered and sold SPRK tokens, a Texas district court ruled on Wednesday. 

The judge said that securities laws applied to Balina and that SPRK tokens met the criteria of the Howey Test, a 1946 U.S. Supreme Court case frequently cited by the SEC in cases involving crypto, to determine if an asset qualifies as an investment contract and, therefore, a security.

"The Court holds as a matter of law that U.S. securities laws apply to Balina’s conduct and that the SPRK tokens are securities," the judge concluded.

Balina was charged in September 2022 over his involvement with an unregistered initial coin offering (ICO). The SEC's allegations center around the ICO for Sparkster, which was pitched as a "no-code" development platform. The platform agreed to get rid of its remaining tokens in 2022 and did not admit or deny the SEC's findings. 

THE SCOOP

Keep up with the latest news, trends, charts and views on crypto and DeFi with a new biweekly newsletter from The Block's Frank Chaparro

By signing-up you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
By signing-up you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

The SEC said Balina bought $5 million worth of SPRK tokens and promoted them on YouTube, Telegram and other social media platforms. The agency also alleged that Balina failed to disclose that Sparkster agreed to pay a 30% bonus on the tokens that he bought "as consideration for his promotional efforts." Balina also allegedly organized an "investing pool" of about 68 people to whom he offered and sold those tokens. Balina should have registered the offering, the SEC said. 

Balina did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

In a post on his website, Balina called the SEC's charges "an unfounded effort based upon multiple misconceptions of fact and law." 


Disclaimer: The Block is an independent media outlet that delivers news, research, and data. As of November 2023, Foresight Ventures is a majority investor of The Block. Foresight Ventures invests in other companies in the crypto space. Crypto exchange Bitget is an anchor LP for Foresight Ventures. The Block continues to operate independently to deliver objective, impactful, and timely information about the crypto industry. Here are our current financial disclosures.

© 2023 The Block. All Rights Reserved. This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.

About Author

Sarah is a reporter at The Block covering policy, regulation and legal happenings. Before, Sarah was a reporter with CQ Legal writing about securities regulation, which is where she first started reporting on crypto. Sarah has also written for The Bond Buyer and American Banker, among other finance-related publications. She graduated from the University of Missouri and earned a degree in print and digital journalism. Sarah is based in Washington D.C., and is an avid coffee lover. You can follow her on Twitter @ForTheWynn.

Editor

To contact the editor of this story:
Lawrence Lewitinn at
[email protected]