SEC Chair Gensler is mum on possible Grayscale appeal ahead of midnight deadline

Quick Take

  • If the agency does decide to appeal a landmark decision in August that directed the SEC to re-review Grayscale’s bid for a spot bitcoin ETF, it would need to file by midnight. 

Securities and Exchange Commission Chair Gary Gensler was mum about a potential appeal to a high profile ruling involving Grayscale Investments' attempt to convert its flagship fund into a spot bitcoin ETF, declining to comment on the matter when asked by journalists at a press conference on Friday.

The SEC has until midnight to file an appeal over the August decision that directed the regulator to re-review Grayscale's bid for a spot fund, with the court specifically addressing the SEC's differential treatment of spot bitcoin ETFs and similar funds based on futures contracts, which the regulator has approved. 

The asset management firm sued the agency last year following its rejection of the plan for the conversion of its GBTC fund. 

If the SEC does not appeal in the coming hours before midnight, meaning asking for an en banc hearing, which is a a rehearing with all three judges who participated in the initial ruling, then that could lead to continued optimism in the industry that a spot bitcoin ETF is incoming. 

"I think if the SEC doesn't seek a rehearing here, it's another positive sign towards a final approval for an ETF," said Jennifer Schulp, director of financial regulation studies at the libertarian think tank Cato Institute. 

But that won't happen quickly, Schulp warned. 

"It doesn't mean that that approval is coming quickly and it's still not a certainty given that the SEC could re-review and deny on different grounds and basically start this legal fight all over again," Schulp said. 

High profile ruling

Grayscale first brought the case against the SEC last year for the rejection of its proposal to convert its flagship fund, GBTC, into a spot bitcoin ETF. Don Verrilli, lead counsel for Grayscale, said during oral arguments in March that the SEC is contradicting itself by allowing bitcoin futures ETFs, but not a spot bitcoin ETF.

Grayscale sent a letter to the SEC last month asking to meet with regulators to discuss converting its Grayscale Bitcoin Trust into a spot bitcoin ETF. 


Keep up with the latest news, trends, charts and views on crypto and DeFi with a new biweekly newsletter from The Block's Frank Chaparro

By signing-up you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
By signing-up you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

 "We hope you will agree that the best use of resources now is for the Commission to issue an order approving NYSE Arca’s Rule 19b-4 filing and authorize the staff to work with Grayscale and NYSE Arca to finalize the prompt listing of the Trust’s shares," lawyers for Grayscale said at the time. 

The SEC has not yet greenlit a spot bitcoin ETF, though the Grayscale ruling was seen as a positive for the slew of firms that have applied for spot bitcoin ETFs over the past few months including big names such as BlackRock and Fidelity.

What now? 

The SEC could decide to not ask for an en banc hearing and instead re-review Grayscale's application and perhaps find a different reason to not approve of it, Schulp said. 

"They've considered it several times in the past and have given consistent reasoning on the denial so to go back now, re review it, and come up with a new reason, leaves that pretty vulnerable to challenge again and I would think would make it difficult for the D.C. Circuit to agree with them that any new reason was also not arbitrary and capricious," Schulp said. "That said, we've seen stranger things out of the SEC. And if there is appetite for not wanting to approve this, that's a path that the SEC could take."

However, the most likely outcome is that the SEC delays making a decision, but ultimately approves all the spot bitcoin ETF applications together at the "last possible minute."

The SEC could also decide not to file for a rehearing on Friday, and instead file for a U.S. Supreme Court review, which Schulp said was not expected, but is possible. 

Updated at 3:45 p.m. ET with comments from Jennifer Schulp 

© 2023 The Block. All Rights Reserved. This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.


About Author

Sarah is a reporter at The Block covering policy, regulation and legal happenings. Before, Sarah was a reporter with CQ Legal writing about securities regulation, which is where she first started reporting on crypto. Sarah has also written for The Bond Buyer and American Banker, among other finance-related publications. She graduated from the University of Missouri and earned a degree in print and digital journalism. Sarah is based in Washington D.C., and is an avid coffee lover. You can follow her on Twitter @ForTheWynn.


To contact the editor of this story:
Nathan Crooks at
[email protected]