Republican senators tell Gensler they're troubled over SEC inaccuracies in DEBT Box case

Quick Take

  • Sens. Cynthia Lummis of Wyoming, Bill Hagerty of Tennessee, Katie Boyd Britt of Alabama, Thom Tillis of North Carolina and JD Vance of Ohio said the SEC’s mission of protecting investors and maintaining fair markets was “compromised” by its handling of the case in a letter penned to Gensler on Wednesday. 

Republican senators have a bone to pick with Securities and Exchange Commission Chair Gary Gensler over inaccurate statements the agency made in its lawsuit against crypto startup DEBT Box. 

Sens. Cynthia Lummis of Wyoming, Bill Hagerty of Tennessee, Katie Boyd Britt of Alabama, Thom Tillis of North Carolina and JD Vance of Ohio said the SEC's mission of protecting investors and maintaining fair markets was "compromised" by its handling of the case in a letter penned to Gensler on Wednesday. 

"We are greatly concerned by the Commission’s conduct in this case," they said in the letter. "It is unconscionable that any federal  agency—especially one regularly involved in highly consequential legal procedures and one that, under your leadership, has often pursued its regulatory mission through enforcement actions  rather than rulemakings—could operate in such an unethical and unprofessional manner." 

The SEC first sued Digital Licensing Inc., doing business as DEBT Box, in July, for defrauding thousands of investors of at least $49 million by offering customers so-called "node licenses" to receive revenue from mining 11 tokens, though they were never mined. 

The agency later said in late December that it made inaccurate statements and said it "fell short" of the expectations to be accurate and candid in the court. Utah U.S. District Court Judge Robert Shelby had criticized the agency's lawyers and ordered the SEC to explain "false or misleading" statements after it claimed the company was trying to move assets overseas in order to escape the regulator's jurisdiction.

Plans to dismiss the case 

The SEC told the court last week that it planned to dismiss the case against DEBT Box without prejudice, meaning the SEC can still refile its case. 

THE SCOOP

Keep up with the latest news, trends, charts and views on crypto and DeFi with a new biweekly newsletter from The Block's Frank Chaparro

By signing-up you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
By signing-up you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

"Regardless of whether Commission staff deliberately misrepresented  evidence or unknowingly presented false information, this case suggests other enforcement cases brought by the Commission may be deserving of scrutiny," the senators said in their letter. "It is difficult to maintain confidence  that other cases are not predicated upon dubious evidence, obfuscations, or outright  misrepresentations."

The SEC did not immediately respond to a request for comment. 

The American Securities Association, a trade group representing regional financial services firms, also criticized the SEC's handling of the case. 

“The SEC Director of Enforcement holds a position of trust and confidence, and the American people expect him to act with the highest ethical and moral conduct," said Chris Iacovella, CEO of ASA in a statement. "Instead of upholding that standard, his division intentionally misled a federal court in pursuit of a political agenda against an industry the SEC doesn’t like.”

Lawmakers, many Republicans, in Washington have been critical of Chair Gensler's approach to regulating crypto. Gensler has said many cryptocurrencies are securities and has brought charges against large crypto exchanges who he says need to register with the agency. 

Sen. Hagerty, who signed this week's letter, has said that Gensler's "posture" is hurtful to the industry. Others are working on bills to regulate the industry, including a bill focused on stablecoins. Top Democrat of the House Financial Services Committee Maxine Waters of California told Politico on Wednesday that negotiators are "very, very close" to reaching agreement on that stablecoin bill after talks over the summer dissolved over a provision that allows state regulators to approve stablecoin issuances without Federal Reserve input.


Disclaimer: The Block is an independent media outlet that delivers news, research, and data. As of November 2023, Foresight Ventures is a majority investor of The Block. Foresight Ventures invests in other companies in the crypto space. Crypto exchange Bitget is an anchor LP for Foresight Ventures. The Block continues to operate independently to deliver objective, impactful, and timely information about the crypto industry. Here are our current financial disclosures.

© 2023 The Block. All Rights Reserved. This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.

TAGS
SEC

About Author

Sarah is a reporter at The Block covering policy, regulation and legal happenings. Before, Sarah was a reporter with CQ Legal writing about securities regulation, which is where she first started reporting on crypto. Sarah has also written for The Bond Buyer and American Banker, among other finance-related publications. She graduated from the University of Missouri and earned a degree in print and digital journalism. Sarah is based in Washington D.C., and is an avid coffee lover. You can follow her on Twitter @ForTheWynn.

Editor

To contact the editor of this story:
Nathan Crooks at
[email protected]